Subsonic Trail Boss Loads
Date: Jul 31 2013
There has been a lot of chatter on Internet sites lately about centerfire loads that fire bullets at subsonic velocities. The advantages of such loads, the posters type, are low noise and an absence of recoil, and I’m all for that. So I started a search for subsonic loads for a few of my centerfire rifles to see if there was any substance to bullets at subsonic speeds. For the sake of argument, let’s say 1,100 fps is the speed of sound, and any bullet flying slower than that is considered subsonic.
Powders suitable to attain such a slow velocity are very limited in cartridges such as the .223 Remington, .243, .30-30 and .308 Winchesters and .30-06. Light amounts of relatively fast burning powders intended primarily for handgun cartridges, like 2400, Unique and Red Dot, come close but do not quite generate that velocity level. Loading heavy bullets with these powders, and a few others, lowers velocities even more, but then there’s the matter of suitable rifling twist to stabilize such heavy, long bullets at subsonic speed.
IMR’s Trail Boss is the only powder I’ve found that works to achieve subsonic velocities in a variety of rifle cartridges. The powder was designed primarily for handgun cartridges shooting lead bullets at low velocity. The powder also works well to produce slow velocities in rifle cartridges because its circular kernels with a hole in the middle are fluffy, and a charge occupies a good portion of a powder capacity in a rifle case. For instance, a minimum charge of Trail Boss for the .243 Winchester takes up about 60 percent of the .243’s powder capacity and about 75 percent of the .308 Winchester’s. That works as a safety factor, too, because it would be next to impossible to load a double charge of Trail Boss.
The Hodgdon Powder website (hodgdon.com) lists Trail Boss loads for rifle cartridges. I pretty much used the minimum charge weights for my five rifle cartridges to keep bullet velocities below 1,100 fps. The lack of noise was the first thing I noticed shooting Trail Boss in the .223 Remington. The report was not much louder than high-velocity .22 LR cartridges. In fact, the .223 was a bit easier on my ears, because it lacked the crack of the shock wave of a supersonic bullet. Recoil barely bumped the scope’s crosshairs off the aiming circle.
Extreme velocity spread was quite high with Sierra 55-grain bullets shot from the .223 Remington. One bullet with a low velocity of 951 fps hit about 2 inches below others of normal velocity, and one bullet with a high velocity of 1,118 fps hit about the same amount high. Bullets with velocities close to 1,000 fps, though, made a fairly tight group, under an inch, at 50 yards. Five of these Sierra bullets, however, will land in .75 to .50 inch at 100 yards when they are shot at a regular velocity of 3,200 fps with a maximum amount of Benchmark powder. That indicates these 55-grain bullets are at the ragged edge of stability fired from my Savage’s one-in- 9-inch twist barrel. According to the “Sierra Bullets Infinity” ballistics program, the 55-grain bullets at a velocity of 1,000 fps require a rifling twist of at least 10.82-1 to stabilize, so the spin imparted to them by my Savage’s 9-inch twist was enough; however, the spin from a regular one-in-12-inch twist of a .223 Remington is not sufficient.
Proper twist rate for subsonic velocities was really evident from the poor results with the .243 Winchester shooting 100-grain bullets. My Cooper Model 22 .243 has a one-in-10-inch twist barrel and always groups Nosler 100-grain Solid Base bullets under an inch at 100 yards when shot with a muzzle velocity of about 2,900 fps. With a muzzle velocity of 950 fps, the bullets hit the target sideways at 50 yards. According to the Sierra ballistics program, my .243 Winchester would need a twist of one in 7 inches to stabilize the Solid Base bullet at that slow speed. A lighter and shorter bullet, like a 75-grain hollowpoint, would just stabilize in my 10-inch twist barrel.
The .30 WCF shot well with Trail Boss and cast bullets with extreme velocity spreads of 28 fps for five shots with 150-grain cast bullets. For some reason, though, the bullet holes on the target had a bit of vertical stringing to them. On the other hand, the longer RCBS 30-165-SIL cast bullets showed little vertical stringing, even though their velocity spread was nearly twice as much. Cast bullets are probably a better choice for subsonic loads than jacketed bullets. For one thing, they are much less expensive than jacketed bullets. Plus, a bullet cast of soft lead alloy like wheelweights and with a wide, flat nose might expand at 1,000 fps or so when it hits game.
I greatly appreciated the quiet report from .308 Winchester subsonic loads when shooting the Colt LE901 autoloader. When shooting regular loads from the rifle’s 16-inch barrel, the muzzle blast causes passing small birds to fall from the air. With subsonics, the .308 just goes bang. These low-pressure loads fail to cycle the action, however, and the rifle’s charging handle must be pulled back to eject a fired case and the bolt let go to slam forward and chamber another round.
Sierra 150- and Speer 165-grain bullets shot fine from the .308’s one-in-10-inch twist. Some handloaders, however, prefer a heavier bullet for a flatter trajectory and more bullet energy, but a twist of one in 7 inches is required to stabilize such heavy bullets, like Berger 215-grain Hybrid Target bullets. These heavy bullets carry only about an additional 100 foot-pounds (ftlbs) of energy and shoot about an inch flatter at 100 yards than the lighter bullet.
The .30-06 is about the upper limit of bullet diameter compared to case size for subsonic loads. In fact, Hodgdon does not list subsonic Trail Boss loads for rifle cartridges with a case larger than the .30-06. It does, however, list a velocity of 1,061 fps for Nosler 150-grain Ballistic Tips with 13.3 grains of Trail Boss from the .30-06. I bumped that charge up to 13.5 grains for 150- and 165-grain bullets and was surprised when velocities were 200 to 300 fps faster than those reported by Hodgdon. There was a definite crack to the loads’ reports. The loads were consistent with extreme velocity spreads for five shots as low as 12 fps. Sierra 150s shot accurately, and all three loads I tried were pleasant to shoot.
A few times in the past I’ve measured headspace dimensions on cases fired with low-pressure and low-velocity loads and found the cases had shortened on firing. To determine if this occurred with subsonic loads, I measured the length of the case head to datum line on the case shoulders of unfired .223s, .243s, .308s and .30-06s. Cases were measured again after they had been fired. The cases had not shortened in length at the shoulders, nor had they lengthened. The cases had expanded enough in width in the forward portion of the body, though, to seal the chamber on firing. If they had not, there would have been black soot from the burned powder on the cases behind the shoulders.
I’m still trying to determine if subsonic loads are useful. Their mild report is nice, especially in the field without hearing protection. Noise would be nothing if a suppressor was used to hush the report of powder gases hitting the air. That would come in handy for shooting, say, feral hogs or raccoons at night near populated areas. On the minus side, much past 50 yards, bullet trajectory is like a thrown rock. Too, the bullets fired from the .30 WCF and .308 Winchester carry only about the same energy as a bullet fired from a .38 Special handgun. For the .223 Remington, anyhow, there is little sense spending the money to build a centerfire subsonic load when its performance can be duplicated with an inexpensive .22 Long Rifle cartridge shooting a 40-grain bullet at 1,300 fps. At 50 yards, the subsonic loads I shot hit only an inch or two below aim at 100 yards with the rifle sighted in for high velocity loads. The subsonic loads hit a couple feet below point of aim at 100 yards.